Independent editorial reviewArchive edition · October 2026
TCF
THE CONDUCT FILE
Officer conduct. Public record.
ON RECORD14 files

Archived edition · Oct. 5, 2026 · TCF Method 2.0 draft
This is a preserved earlier report. View the current department report.

File 02 · Arkansas · Draft

Bentonville Police Department

Review: Jan. 1, 2025 – Oct. 4, 2026
TCF Method 2.0 draft

B
Department research fileSaved review · Oct. 5, 2026
Original report cardView full size
Original Bentonville report card. Text summary, scoring, and limitations are provided on this page.

Original saved artwork. Select the card to inspect it at full resolution.

Category / evidence statusTCF Method 2.0 draft
Category assessment from the saved Bentonville draft
CategoryAssessed pointsChecks assessed
Constitutional policingNR0 of 4
Conduct & accountability5 / 51 of 4
Transparency & records2.5 / 51 of 4
Use-of-force oversightNR0 of 4
Training & supervision5 / 51 of 4

The record so far

Read the complete PDF
Employment action · 2025

Reported termination

The saved report cites a chief-confirmed firing following an alleged geese shooting. It records the employment action separately from the unverified final criminal outcome.

Saved research · page 10
Court ruling · June 2026

Crum v. Reinhardt

The saved notes describe a qualified-immunity dismissal. They do not treat that order as a decision resolving the underlying constitutional question or every aspect of the search.

Saved research · page 10
Sustained findings · 2025

Communications center only

The reviewed summary lists seven sustained internal complaints involving the communications center. The report does not attribute them to sworn patrol officers; conduct and penalty details were absent.

Saved research · page 10
Positive context · March 2026

Accreditation

The saved review documents law-enforcement and communications accreditation. Accreditation is separate from findings about individual incidents and from the TCF score.

Saved research · page 10
Scope and evidence gaps

Only three of the 20 checks are assessed. Written requirements do not establish actual completion or implementation. The public-comment sample fails the 30-entry minimum. Later case dispositions and full discipline records remain unverified in the saved review.

Selected source links

Links reproduced from the saved research. Findings retain the report’s original review date.

The full source register is in the research PDF.

Agency response

None requested or received for this draft. Existing public statements are cited in the research notes.